1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Legal Guide

Franchising, as a method of business expansion and organization, represents one of the most dynamic commercial sectors in Canada. In a typical franchise relationship, the franchisor licenses the franchisee the right to sell products and services under the franchisor’s trade-mark using the franchisor’s prescribed business format. In return, the franchisee agrees to comply with the standards of the franchise system, and to pay an up-front fee and continuing royalties. Franchise arrangements can take many different forms, from master franchise relationships involving multiple locations to single unit franchise agreements for individual locations.

The importance of franchising to the Canadian economy should not be underestimated. Not only does Canada offer a powerful economic environment, but the legal framework for franchising is encouraging. Currently, only Alberta, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Manitoba have specific registration or disclosure legislation in force, with which a franchisor looking to set up a franchise system in those provinces must comply. There is currently no specific registration or disclosure legislation dealing with franchising which is in force in the other provinces, although, as noted below, British Columbia is currently contemplating such legislation and the British Columbia Law Reform Commission has recommended that franchise legislation be implemented in British Columbia. However, many business practices prevalent in franchising are subject to regulation by both federal and provincial laws of general application. In addition, franchisors that are members of the Canadian Franchise Association are encouraged to comply with the minimum disclosure obligations of that organization.

Franchise Disclosure, Registration and Regulation

Alberta, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Manitoba are the only provinces in Canada with legislation in effect that specifically governs certain aspects of franchising. The province of British Columbia is also currently examining the possibility of enacting legislation. Each of these Acts contains broad definitions of what constitutes a franchise and, as a result, many distribution and dealership arrangements may also be subject to their requirements.

In substance, the Alberta, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Manitoba Acts are very similar. They primarily contain disclosure requirements and a number of relationship provisions. None of these Acts directly regulate the substantive aspects of the franchise relationship. The Acts require fair dealing between parties to franchise agreements, that franchisees have the right to associate, and they impose disclosure obligations on franchisors.

All five Acts require franchisors to provide a disclosure document to prospective franchisees. The disclosure document must contain copies of all franchise agreements and financial statements, and all material facts, including specifically listed material facts. In Alberta, Prince Edward Island, Manitoba and New Brunswick, franchisors are permitted to use disclosure documents acceptable under franchise legislation in jurisdictions outside of those provinces, as the case may be, provided that these disclosure documents include, by way of an addendum or “wrap around” document, any information necessary to meet the requirements of a disclosure document under the relevant provincial franchise legislation. The Ontario Act does not specifically provide for an addendum or “wrap around” document. As a result, a disclosure document is often prepared for Ontario in accordance with the Ontario Act, and then a “wrap around” is prepared to meet the requirements of the other provinces.

Financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles must normally be included within the disclosure statement. The minimum standards of review under the Acts are those of review engagement standard. Certain franchisors are exempt from the requirement to include financial statements in their disclosure documents. The disclosure document must also include a certificate certifying that the disclosure document contains no misrepresentation.

The Acts impose on the parties to a franchise agreement a duty of fair dealing in the performance and enforcement of that agreement. They also provide the franchisee a private right of action for damages against the franchisor, and every person who signed the disclosure document if the franchisee suffers a loss because of a misrepresentation contained in the disclosure document. As well, if the franchisee did not receive the franchise disclosure document within the time limits set out in the appropriate Act, the franchisee has the right to rescind all franchise agreements.


Franchising in Quebec is different than in the other provinces, in that the law is governed by the Civil Code of Québec. One interesting feature of the Civil Code of Québec is the concept of contracts of adhesion, where the essential provisions are imposed by one of the contracting parties and are not negotiable. The consequences of a contract being qualified as a contract of adhesion are that if one of its provisions is incomprehensable, unreadable or abusive, that provision may be nullified or modified by a court. The same applies to “external” clauses (i.e. clauses that are not contained in the contract but to which the contract refers). The courts of Quebec have often characterized a franchise agreement as an adhesion contract, when it has been shown that its essential provisions could not be negotiated.

Franchise businesses intending to operate in Quebec must also comply with French language laws and, in particular, the Charter of the French language. Franchisors should realize that they will be expected to carry on business in French, especially outside Montréal, and have all of their materials (operations manuals and other documentation for use by employees) translated into French, although the franchise agreement itself need not be translated. (For more information on some of these topics, please refer to the corresponding sections in this publication.)

Other Areas of Law Affecting Franchising Arrangements

In addition to complying with the specific franchise legislation, businesses expanding into Canada by way of franchising will also want to ensure that they comply with other laws of general application affecting franchising arrangements. These include ensuring that their trade-marks are protected under Canadian trade-mark legislation, that their products and practices comply with applicable product labelling (e.g. for food and drugs) and consumer protection legislation, and that their arrangements comply with Canadian competition laws (which deal with matters such as exclusive dealing, market restriction and tied-selling) and applicable tax requirements.

Additional posts from the blog



Canada’s Anti-Spam Law – New Guidance on Offering Apps, Software

by Margot Patterson

CASL also prohibits installing a “computer program” – including an app, widget, software, or other executable data – on a computer system (e.g. computer, device) unless the program is installed with consent and complies with disclosure requirements. The provisions in CASL related to the installation of computer programs will come into force on January 15, 2015.



Environment Canada issues Hydrofluorocarbon reporting requirement

by Nalin Sahni

On April 7, 2014, the Minister of the Environment issued a Notice with respect to hydrofluorocarbons (the “Notice”), pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. The Notice imposes reporting requirements on those who imported, exported, or manufactured certain hydrofluorocarbons (“HFCs”) from 2008 and 2012. A non-exhaustive list of HFCs subject to these reporting requirements can be found in Schedule 1 of the Notice.



“Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.”

by Andy Pushalik

In an interesting decision, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has ruled that an employer is not liable for discriminatory and harassing texts sent by a rogue employee to another of its workers.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

© 2014 Dentons