1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Legal Guide

The potential of the British Columbia offshore region is largely unknown, due to a moratorium on oil and gas activities that has been imposed by both the federal and provincial governments since 1972. The moratorium was imposed due to concerns regarding interference with fishery activities and the concerns of adverse environmental impacts. However, interest in the area remains high. While there have been no significant discoveries, there are areas within the British Columbia offshore region that are considered to be highly prospective. In 2003, the federal government initiated a scientific review, a public review process and a First Nations engagement process. The scientific panel found some scientific gaps needed to be filled prior to lifting the moratorium. Strongly held and widely polarized views were identified in the public review, and all participating First Nations expressed the view that lifting the moratorium would not be in their best interest, although some qualified their response with “not at this time”. In the 2007 BC Energy Plan, the government of British Columbia committed to offshore oil and gas exploration and development, and asked the federal government to lift the moratorium. The BC government indicated the provincial moratorium would be lifted at the same time. As of August 2012, the moratoria were still in place.

Additional posts from the blog



Environment Canada issues Hydrofluorocarbon reporting requirement

by Nalin Sahni

On April 7, 2014, the Minister of the Environment issued a Notice with respect to hydrofluorocarbons (the “Notice”), pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. The Notice imposes reporting requirements on those who imported, exported, or manufactured certain hydrofluorocarbons (“HFCs”) from 2008 and 2012. A non-exhaustive list of HFCs subject to these reporting requirements can be found in Schedule 1 of the Notice.



“Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.”

by Andy Pushalik

In an interesting decision, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has ruled that an employer is not liable for discriminatory and harassing texts sent by a rogue employee to another of its workers.



Canada’s Digital Privacy Rethink: Fines, Enforceable Compliance Agreements and More!

by Timothy Banks

On April 8, 2014, Canada’s government introduced Bill S-4, the Digital Privacy Act, in the Senate. Bill S-4 is the federal government’s latest attempt to reform the federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA”). It would be a mistake to say that it is largely recycled from the government’s last attempt to reform PIPEDA in 2011 through Bill C-12, which died on the order paper. Here’s what’s different, what’s been dropped, and what seems to be largely the same. Caveat: This is a first read!

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

© 2014 Dentons